y = −2x + 13
y = 2x − 3
Set the equations to equal and solve for x:
-2x + 13 = 2x -3
Add 2X to each side:
13 = 4x -3
Add 3 to each side:
16 = 4x
Divide both sides by 4:
x = 16/4
x = 4
Now replace x with 4 in one of the equations and solve for y:
y = -2(4) +13
y = -8 +13
y = 5
x = 4 and y = 5 , which is the ordered pair (4,5)
Both numbers are positive values, so the second graph is correct.
Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
Answer:
The measurement of EF is 1.98 units
Step-by-step explanation:
In Δ DEF
∵ m∠E = 90°
∴ FD is the hypotenuse of the triangle
∵ m∠D = 26°
∵ EF is opposite to angle D
- We can use the sine ratio to find it
∵ sin D = ⇒ (opposite side / hypotenuse)
∵ FD = 4.5 units
∴ sin(26) =
- Multiply both sides by 4.5
∴ 4.5 sin(26) = EF
∵ sin 26° ≈ 0.44
∴ 4.5(0.44) = EF
∴ 1.98 = EF
The measurement of EF is 1.98 units
Answer:
3/6 or 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
y2-y1 = 8-2 = 6
x2-x1 = 3-0 = 3
The point would be (3,6) or if simplified (1,2)
HOPEFULLY THIS HELPED :)