Could you please express this question better, I don't seem to understand the objective.
Answer:
In decimal for -22.5
Step-by-step explanation:
something
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
With regards to the factor 'walking device used', the ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device, and also with the results of the experiment giving rise to a p - value less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis which says, there is no effect of the walking device factor.
We can thus conclude that there is not enough statistics evidence to prove that there is no interaction between the two factors or that there is no effect of the walking device given the cadence data.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>1 transformation</u> - translation 3 units to the right and 4 units down. This translation has the rule
<u>2 transformation</u> - reflection across the x-axis. This reflection has the rule
<u>3 transformation</u> - dilation by a factor of 4 with the origin as the center of dilation. This dilation has the rule
Now, the sequence of these three transformation has the rule
If the net was folded into a cylinder, the length of the rentangle would be the circumference of the circle since it wraps around it.
C = 2pi*r
So 2pi*3 = 6pi
Then multiply by the height to get 84pi
Then the area of a circle is pi*r^2
We have two circles so 2 * pi * 3^2 = 18pi
Add to get 84pi + 18pi = 102pi.