Answer:
The answer is:
Total loss to the left of the intersection
Total profit to the right of the intersection
Explanation:
Cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is a method that looks into the impact of how varying levels of costs and volume will affect the operating profit of a firm. This gives companies good understanding of the profitability of their products or services.
To answer the question above;
Total loss to the left of the intersection
Total profit to the right of the intersection
While the intersection is the break-even
Answer:
Cash price of the car
= Down payment + A(1 - <u>(1+r/m)</u>-nm
r/m
= $2,200 + $200(1-<u>(1+0.11/12</u>)-4x12
0.11/12
= $2,200 + $200(1-<u>(1+0.0091666667</u>)-48
0.0091666667
= $2,200 + $200(1-(<u>1.009166666667</u>)-48
0.0091666667
= $2,200 + `$200(38.691421)
= $9,938
Explanation:
The cash price of the car is equal to the down payment plus the present value of the monthly installment. The present value of the monthly installment is obtained by using present value of annuity formula.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Critical-Chain
This was introduced or originated by Eli Goldratt in 1997. Its aim is to challenges conventional project management approaches and absolute dependence on TOC principles. The idea of what to change or eliminated is the largely rooted behaviors that is common with the traditional project management practices. It is very multitasking anf it is the longest string of reliance that occur on the project.
Critical- Chain Approach
This approach simply covers project network as it ca be limited by both resource and technical reliance/dependencies. each type of limitations can create task reliance.
The Summary of Critical Chain Approach
1.) use Aggressive but Possible Times (ABPT) for task durations
2.) identify the critical chain by accounting for resource dependencies
3.) use buffer management to track project progress etc.
Answer:
1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.
2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.
3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.
Explanation:
