The answer is no. because is you substitute the value 3 in for x into the equation and solve you get,
4(3)+3=18 which says 12+3=18 15=18 and that is an untrue statement.
Hope this helps explain the concept so you understand! Any questions feel free to ask! Please rate if I helped you! thank you so much!!
125/12 would be your equivalent improper fraction
Answer:
<h2>☆<《
<em><u>HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>》</u></em><em><u>></u></em><em><u>☆</u></em></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The opposite of :-
-4=4
1= -1
-2.5= 2.5
101 = -101
1/2= -1/2
Exercise 1:
exponential decay:
The function is given by:
y = A (b) ^ ((1/3) * t)
Where,
A = 600
We look for b:
(480/600) * (100) = 80%
b = 0.8
Substituting:
y = 600 * (0.8) ^ ((1/3) * t)
We check for t = 6
y = 600 * (0.8) ^ ((1/3) * 6)
y = 384
Answer:
exponential decay:
y = 600 * (0.8) ^ ((1/3) * t)
Exercise 2:
linear:
The function is given by:
y = ax + b
Where,
a = -60 / 2 = -30
b = 400
Substituting we have:
y = -30 * x + 400
We check for x = 4
y = -30 * 4 + 400
y = 280
Answer:
linear:
y = -30 * x + 400
Exercise 3:
exponential growth:
The function is given by:
y = A (b) ^ ((1/3) * t)
Where,
A = 512
We look for b:
(768/512) * (100) = 150%
b = 1.5
Substituting:
y = 512 * (1.5) ^ ((1/2) * t)
We check for t = 4
y = 512 * (1.5) ^ ((1/2) * 4)
y = 1152
Answer:
exponential growth:
y = 512 * (1.5) ^ ((1/2) * t)