The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "d. returning to the place of purchase." Most consumer complaints are resolved by returning to the place of purchase. The return and exchange policy also applies to certain conditions.
Answer:
The answer is: C) Operation Methbust would reduce the supply of meth; Operation Say No would reduce the demand for meth.
Explanation:
Operation Methbust is about reducing the number of suppliers of methamphetamines by destroying meth labs and arresting those responsible. While Operation Say No to Meth is about reducing the demand of meth by educating possible consumers about the risks of using meth.
The answer to your question is the area under the demand curve
Answer: Liability of $300,000
Explanation:
In the question above, what we have is a deferred tax liability, which could be explained as the amount accrued in taxes at a present time but payable in the future. The tax rate will not be based in the present tax rate. Thus is why we will not be using the 30% tax tate of 2018 in calculating the tax amount.
Tax rate = 40%
Exceeded tax basis = $750,000
0.4 × 750,000 = $300,000
Therefore, Johns-Hopper should report the deferred tax effect of this difference in its December 31, 2018, balance sheet as Liability of $300,000
