Answer:
B. Crampons" is a technical language that supports the overall meaning that Greco is a town centered on the hiking-related tourist industry.
Explanation:
A technical language is one that is intended for an audience with a particular level of knowledge in a field. The word crampon may not be easily known to people who do not hike in icy territories.
When the word Crampon is used by the author, it gives the reader an insight into the fact that the city being described by the author is a hub for hiking-related activities. So, we can conclude that crampon is a technical language that supports the idea that Greco is a town centered on the hiking-related tourist industry.
Answer:
i) Prativa never watches horror movies. (What
question)
= What does Prativa never watch?
ii) People speak English all over the world. (into
passive voice)
= English is spoken by the people
iii)Teachers asked the students to respect their
seniors. (into direct speech)
= Teachers said to students,"Respect your.
seniors."
Answer:
A or C
Explanation:
One theme the author explores, then, is the effect of naming on persona and psychology. Santha does not feel the weight or history of her past when she is at school. As "Cynthia," she focuses on wanting to have a cotton dress like another girl and eat British style sandwiches to fit in.
The three sentences have been combined below using the joining word, when:
- When the clouds turned stormy gray and slowly moved across the sky, I knew it was time to head indoors.
Joining or linking words are used to connect ideas in a group of sentences. Separating sentences can lead to the loss of meanings being conveyed by authors.
Transition and joining words such as because, although, when, therefore, thus, however, make it easier to follow up ideas and to find the connection between them.
In the sentence above, the linking word 'when' was effectively used to merge the three sentences.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/24204143
Answer:
The tone of the article is contradicting
Explanation:
The tone of the article is contradicting as it clearly states that on one hand it is claimed that Chicago will be the forefront of the green roof movement while on the other hand it shows the existing scenario in Chicago as per which only one tenth of the 1% of the Chicago's building have green roof.
