Answer:
Distinguish between an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage is discussed below.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage and a comparative advantage
- Absolute advantage concentrates on the marginal cost of reproduction of an asset whereas comparative advantage characteristically concentrates on the opportunity cost of production.
- Trading judgments based on comparative advantage between nations are forever respectively advantageous.
Answer:
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is $828.06
Explanation:
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is the value of payments at a specific date in the future based on the payments being recurring and assuming a discount rate. The future value of an annuity (FVA) is based on regular cash flow. The higher the discount rate, the greater the annuity's future value.
Where:
FVA is The future value of an annuity (FVA)
P is payment per period
n is the number of period
r is the discount rate
Given that:
P = $195
r = 4% = 0.04
n = 4 years
substituting values
The future value of an annuity (FVA) is $828.06
Option 5
Content analysis is: the systematic procedure of taking individual responses and grouping them into larger theme categories or patterns.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Content analysis is the well-organized investigation of the content of a manuscript quantitatively or qualitatively. Content analysis is a analysis procedure practiced to produce replicable and accurate conclusions by evaluating and coding textual element.
A simplistic model of content analysis is sentiment analysis – a routine handled to seize people’s view or approach to an thing, or aspect. Content analysis is valuable in organizational inquiry because it enables researchers to improve and measure the distinctions of organizational practices,societal biases.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in a microsoft excel document.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer:
Sink-Cost Fallacy
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various behaviorists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the mental bias that describes Les's behavior is called the Sink-Cost Fallacy. This fallacy/bias refers to when an individual relentlessly continues's a behavior solely because of the resources that they have invested, either being time, money, or effort. Which in this case since, Les invested money into the drink so he does not want to waste it even though it might make him sick.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.