The answer is
<span>Night Of The Spadefoot Toads </span>ch17
She infers the most important one. It is a cruel injustice to deny women the right to vote. She says it is an oligarchy based on gender which translated means that women and enslaved by the men in her household. She is not respected as mother. She is not respected as sister or as wife as long as she is not equal to men.
She makes 2 references to the Federal Constitution held to be so important to all Americans.
The first is that the constitution begins with "We the People." Who is we? How is 'we' defined? Does it mean everyone or does it mean just males. History would say most of the time it means just males.
The second reference is a good deal more complex and uses legal jargon. It is an ex post facto law. This is a law that makes it a crime for acting in a legal way. She also uses the term attainder in the same sentence which is the abolishment of a citizen's civil rights after committing a felony. What she means is that any state that passes a law that prohibits half the population from voting is committing an attainder or a ex post facto law, which the constitution expressly forbids.
I think one of the things worth noting is that she committed the felony in the 1872 election (voting illegally), and women did not receive the vote until 1920. That's nearly 48 years between her act and what she was aiming to accomplish. She did not live to see her life's work come to fruition.
Answer:
People should be taught to preserve food so that they do not waste any food at all.
Explanation:
If we preserve food so that we do not wast any food at all, we wouldn't have so much food. In fact, we would only have as much food as we need if we preserved the food. If this were the case, the poor would have access to food that isn't being preserved for later use because other foods, by people who can afford food, are already preserving food. Therefore, they wouldn't need to buy so much food.
