It helps you save a lot of money, if you are on zero budget you wont be as willing to spend money on non sense rather than if you were to have say a weekly budget to where you know how much money you can spend on non sense. hope that makes sense.
It would be C because women are thought to be physically weaker and not as useful as men. Women can be useful but in certain professions its a lot harder for them. Also men tend to be more willing to work when they get injured or such.
Answer:
It will Decreases U.S. real GDP and on the other way round it will increases the well-being of a typical working person in the U.S.
Explanation:
The impact of the decline in working hours is that it will Decreases U.S. real GDP and on the other way round it will definitely lead to increase in the well-being of a typical working person in the U.S. because of the decline in the U.S work week which was formally 60 hours in the 1980 but now 40 hours today because a typical working person will have more time for him/her and the stress involved in working for 60 hours per week will reduce when compared with working for 40 hours per week because a typical working person in the U.S will preferred to work for 40 hours per week than 60hours per week for the betterment of their well being.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that when allocating funds, the firm should probably assign the highest cost of capital to division Z because it is most likely the riskiest of the three divisions. This is because Division Z focuses on research and development which means that they might not actually discover or create something that can bring value to the company and is therefore highly risky.