The standard for evaluating sources has been matched with their descriptions as follows:
- Trustworthiness: The issue is addressed from a balanced and fair viewpoint.
- Relevance: The text gives information related to your topic.
- Authority: The writer of the text has experience or expertise on the topic.
- Currency: The information is up-to-date.
<h3>What are the standards for evaluating sources?</h3>
The standards for evaluating sources are the benchmarks that are used to proof articles for accuracy.
Before the information contained in a material can be accepted, the content should be free from bias. It should also be relevant and come from a credible and reliable source.
Learn more about the evaluation of sources here:
brainly.com/question/11916196
#SPJ1
the answer would be A SATIRE because satire means the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.
Could anyone please assist me? This is more humbling.
Greg gets along better with other people at the end of the story because he leans a valuable lesson from fighting the thugs with Lemon Brown.
Answer:
well you could make a cheaper 2 about the return of their better half,I don't know something like that
how they always had it and they just had to find it deep inside them
like discovering themselves,and realising that they just had to love themselves for who or what they were
if you know what I mean
you're the writer
