Answer:
1. Which of the excluded items represent ongoing costs of running the business and which are one-time "special" costs?
it depends on the company and the actual transactions, e.g. equity based compensation might be a one time special cost because it occurred only once and is doubtful that it happens again. But if the company regularly rewards its top managers with this type of compensation, then it is an ongoing cost. E.g. Tesla awarded a HHHHUUUUUUGGGGGGGEEEEEEE bonus to Elon Musk (worth hundreds of millions) but it was a one time event. While many companies use equity compensation on a regular basis.
Severance and related employee "rebalancing" costs generally take place when a company fires a lot of people because it is cutting down some division or product line. Hopefully, they should never happen, and if they do, it should be only a one time event.
Fees paid to consultants and interest expenses are ongoing costs that will probably occur in the future.
Losses related to the abandonment of excess facility space and a facility fire should be one time events. It would be really bad for them to keep happening (same as severance and rebalancing costs)
Answer:
It is true because the mayor will be able to divide successfully the burden of the tax equally if the demand for labor and supply of labor are similarly elastic.
<u>Explanation:</u>
If the labor demand curve is elastic, a little reduction in the compensation will be adequate to build the amount of labor requested to assimilate the expanded inventory. In either case, the harmony will be reestablished with a little change in the pay.
The extent of the impact of welfare change on wages and labor is profoundly subject to the versatility of work requests and work supply. The effect of the versatility of work request and work supply on the rate change in wages and business can be gotten by separating different elasticity's
.
<u></u>
<u />
Answer: B Im pretty sure
Step by step explanation:
The meaning of rational is doing someone with reason or logic so B seems like the rational answer..
Answer:
c. increase of $300,000
Explanation:
The autorized shares do not increase the equity of the firm. The firm generaes equity when the shares are issued. Therefore, we should consider January 2nd issuance:
12,000 common shares x $25 = 300,000 total proceeds
face value: 12,000 common x $5 = 60,000 face value
additional paid-in 240, 000