Answer:
B. Modern theater audiences can be superstitious.
Explanation:
"The Tragedy of Macbeth" is without a doubt a play of superstition. The play is about the degradation of its tragic hero and witches. It is also considered an unlucky play by performers. It is popular belief not to say the name of the character or to say "The Scottish play" instead because the play is cursed. Whether this be true, the truth of the matter is that accidents have befallen many casts and productions from around the world. However, it is important to mention that accidents are unexpected events that can happen anywhere at any time. In summary, this is the reason for which the audience and actors will refuse to say "Macbeth".
Answer:B
Explanation: On edge hope it helps
1. The deep pond is DANGEROUS for small children.
2. We use sugar to SWEETEN tea.
3. My father found EMPLOYMENT in a bank.
4. Money does not always bring HAPPINESS.
5. The two girls came to an AGREEMENT which made them both happy.
6. I saw the most AMAZING sunset over the sea.
7. The computer was a great INVENTION.
8. There was a serious COLLISION on the highway.
9. Did you get PERMISSION to leave school early?
10. The family had made a RESERVATION at the restaurant.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong :)
"The prince" was the first book that didn't take politics as something ethical or philosophical. Machiavelli wrote it to Lorenzo di Medici as a "guide" to maintain his power. Ancient philosophers were focused on constucting the ideal state. That means, they mentioned the characteristics of a succesfull monarchy for example, but did not considered the things as they were at that moment. Readers find disturbing the tactics that Machiavelli describes to gain or maintain power as they include making people fear you or destroying your enemies. This book is always resumed with the phrase "The end justifies the means", making it clear that the rulers can do anything to maintain their power.
The controversy is understandable, this books shows how cruel can reality be and how politics scrifice ethics in the name of power. The discussion is still relevant nowadays. How far can politicians go to win an election?
