Answer:Hope This Helps ☺️
Step-by-step explanation:
She is not correct because she did not substitute the same number in both expressions in Step 1
Step-by-step explanation:
CASE 1: substitute 1 for x to both sides of the equations
L.H.S
-(4x-5)+2(x-3)
-(4 (1) - 5)+ 2(1-3) = - (-1) + 2(-2) = 1 - 4 = -3
R.H.S
-2x - 5
-2(1) - 5 = -2-5 = -7
Hence for x= 1
-(4x-5)+2(x-3) ≠ -2x -5
Because -3 ≠ -7
CASE 2: substitute -1 for x to both sides of the equations
L.H.S
-(4x-5)+2(x-3)
-(4 (-1) - 5)+ 2(-1-3) = - (-9) + 2(-4) = 9 - 8 = 1
R.H.S
-2x - 5
-2(-1) - 5 = 2-5 = -3
Hence for x= -1
-(4x-5)+2(x-3) ≠ -2x -5
Because 1 ≠ -3
Answer:
She is not correct because she did not substitute the same number in both expressions in Step 1
Our parent function is f(x)=x^2. A vertical stretch by a factor of k means that every point (x,f(x)), has been transformed into (x,kf(x)). Alex is clearly incorrect as our parent function has been transformed to (x,9f(x)), not (x,3f(x)). A horizontal stretch(or compression) by a factor of k means our function has been transformed to (x/k,f(x)). Here, Marta is saying our function should look like (3x,f(x)). This can also be achieved by plugging 3x into the parent function, which would give us f(3x)=(3x)^2, so it seems that Marta is the correct one.
Answer:
22.916666666 The six is repeated
Step-by-step explanation:
10/12=8.3333333 and 8.3333333*27.5=22.916666666 repeated
Sry I don’t know try Socratic
The expression is
and the simplified form is
good luck
