For investors, changes made to the tax code by the government are known as a form legislative risk, which results from changes in law.
Legislative risk refers to the possibility that government legislation or regulations will significantly alter the business prospects of one or more companies. These changes may have a negative impact on the firm's investment holdings. The legislative risk may occur as a direct result of government action or by changing customer demand patterns. Investors rarely complain about preferential treatment and bailouts for specific industries, possibly because they all work with the secret hope of profiting from them.
What subsidies and tariffs can give an industry in terms of competitive advantages, regulation and taxation can take away from many others. They can send shockwaves around the world and destroy companies and entire industries with a single law, subsidy, or switch of the printing press. As a result, many investors consider legislative risk to be a major factor when evaluating stocks.
Learn more about legislative risk here:
brainly.com/question/9230331
#SPJ4
Open market operations, U.S. governmental securities.
Open market operations is a tool of monetary policy in which the Federal Reserve buys and sells U.S. governmental securities. This process allows the Federal Reserve to control how much currency (USD) is circulating in the US economy, which impacts the supply and therefore demand for USD and the corresponding value of such USD.
Answer:
I'll assume that the term "parent" here means parent in the conventional term as in father, mother, and children.
With this in mind, parents have the responsibility of organising the family which include their children and the affairs of the house.
Therefore, a parent performs the functions of organizing in management by:
1. Guiding their wards in management principles
2. Educating them in what they should and shouldn't do.
Answer:
<u>a. provide valuable feedback.</u>
Explanation:
Communication has often been defined as a two-way process of sending and then receiving information. So what comes first or the goal based on this definition is getting valuable feedback.
Hence, in ideal situations reaching mutual understanding isn't the goal, neither is commending others or self-advancement, but a conscious satisfaction that comes from having received valuable feedback.
For example, if there's no feedback, then the question about mutual understanding isn't relevant.
