9514 1404 393
Answer:
- Translate P to E; rotate ∆PQR about E until Q is coincident with F; reflect ∆PQR across EF
- Reflect ∆PQR across line PR; translate R to G; rotate ∆PQR about G until P is coincident with E
Step-by-step explanation:
The orientations of the triangles are opposite, so a reflection is involved. The various segments are not at right angles to each other, so a rotation other than some multiple of 90° is involved. A translation is needed in order to align the vertices on top of one another.
The rotation is more easily defined if one of the ∆PQR vertices is already on top of its corresponding ∆EFG vertex, so that translation should precede the rotation. The reflection can come anywhere in the sequence.
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
The mapping can be done in two transformations: translate a ∆PQR vertex to its corresponding ∆EFG point; reflect across the line that bisects the angle made at that vertex by corresponding sides.
2-2=0
5-3=2
so the answer is o over 2 aka 0/2
Answer:
$99/$115 x 100% = 86.086% of the original price
So 100% - 86.086
= 13.9 = 14%
Or you could just do (115 - 99) x 100 which gets the same answer.
Answer:
The equation of the line would be y = -3/2x + 9
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to solve this, start by finding the slope of the original line. You can do this by solving for y.
2x - 3y = 12
-3y = -2x + 12
y = 2/3x - 4
Now that we have a slope of 2/3, we know that the perpendicular slope is -3/2 (since perpendicular lines have opposite and reciprocal slopes). We can use this and the new point in point-slope form to find the equation.
y - y1 = m(x - x1)
y - 6 = -3/2(x - 2)
y - 6 = -3/2x + 3
y = -3/2x + 9