Given the parameters in the diagrams, we have;
4. ∆ABC ≈ ∆DEF by ASA
5. UW ≈ XZ by CPCTC
6. QR ≈ TR by CPCTC
<h3>How can the relationship between the triangles be proven?</h3>
4. The given parameters are;
<B = <E = 90°
AB = DE Definition of congruency
<A = <D Definition of congruency
Therefore;
- ∆ABC ≈ ∆DEF by Angle-Side-Angle, ASA, congruency postulate
5. Given;
XY is perpendicular to WZ
UV is perpendicular to WZ
VW = YZ
<Z = <W
Therefore;
∆UVW ≈ ∆XYZ by Angle-Side-Angle, ASA, congruency postulate
Which gives;
- UW is congruent to XZ, UW ≈ XZ, by Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent, CPCTC
6. Given;
PQ is perpendicular to QT
ST is perpendicular to QT
PQ ≈ ST
From the diagram, we have;
<SRR ≈ <PRQ by vertical angles theorem;
Therefore;
∆QRP ≈ ∆TRS by Side-Angle-Angle, SAA, congruency postulate
Which gives;
- QR ≈ TR by Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent, CPCTC
Learn more about congruency postulates here:
brainly.com/question/26080113
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yessir he's coming soon
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
They averaged 3lbs. a week for 4 weeks to get 12lb. They would need an additional 36lbs. to get to 48lbs. Averaging the same 3lbs. per week, this would take an additional 12 weeks for a total of 16 weeks.
Answer:
f
Step-by-step explanation:
because its rotation, translation, and reflection to be an isomertries
Answer:
Answer: You could have an infinite amount of triangles with these measurements.
Unless, you are missing something in the problem, there is not enough information that would narrow it down to a single triangle. Angle A is fixed and the height is fixed. However, Angle B and C could be anything as long as they formed a triangle and had side a of 15 in between them.
