Answer:
B and C are wrong.
Explanation:
Its most likely probably C though.
Answer:
Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between “environmentally friendly” and “harmful” behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions—the misconceptions that “green” choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. “Eco-guilt” from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is - comforts her without asking for things.
Explanation:
This question refers to Emily Dickinson's poem "Hope." In the poem, the poet compares the feeling of hope to a bird. She says:
<em>Hope is the thing with feathers </em>(referring to birds).
She says that hope never dies; it always lives in us, giving us the motivation to keep going, and to fight. She also says that even though hope gives us so much, it never asks for anything in return:
<em>I’ve heard it in the chillest land -
</em>
<em>And on the strangest Sea -
</em>
<em>Yet - never - in Extremity,
</em>
<em>It asked a crumb - of me.</em>
This question is about "Of Plymouth Plantation" and "The General History of Virginia"
Answer:
"The General History of Virginia" seems more real because it is in first person point of view.
Explanation:
Narrations told in first person offer a more real story, because it is able to convey the narrator's deep and intimate thought about the situations being narrated, with this, the reader has a palpable, detailed and personal account, which can reveal much of the situation and how it affected people's lives for better or for worse, through the feelings, ideas and reflections of the narrator who establishes a direct conversation with the reader.
Answer:
In chapter 3, Doug is upset that Jane Eyre is the assigned reading for his English class. He insists that he will not read it. At this point, we can only surmise the reasons for Doug's dismissal of the book. In chapter 4, we discover (along with Mr. Ferris) that Doug cannot read. Privately, the educator consults with Miss Cowper, who sets out to acquaint Doug with the rudiments of phonics. This changes things for Doug, and he begins to gain an appreciation for reading. The description of Doug's struggles demonstrate the difficulties he has to overcome in his journey toward a greater sense of self.
In chapter 4, we also discover that Doug's terrible secret has been discovered. His peers now know that he has an embarrassing tattoo with the words "Mama's Baby" etched onto his chest. As Doug pours out his pain to Mr. Ferris, we come to understand how deeply our young protagonist has been scarred by his father's abusive actions. In order to heal from his past, Doug must learn new ways of relating to himself, his father, and others.
It is a difficult process, however. In chapter 5, Doug wrestles with his sense of shame and anger. He begins to indulge in self-destructive behavior, gets into fights in school, and stops going to the library. In other words, Doug finds himself on the losing side in the battle against his rage. Later, however, after Mr. Swieteck lies about having taken the hundred dollar prize and signed baseball from Mr. Ballard, Doug decides to challenge his father. He barely dodges his father's fists as he races out of the house.
This interaction between father and son demonstrates Doug's changing perspective and his growing appreciation for the power of truth. No matter the circumstance or challenge, the truth is irrevocable and unflinching. Mr. Swieteck may be bigger, but he cannot argue with the facts. The moment inspires Doug with the realization that his father's outlook on life is flawed and that he, Doug, has the power to choose his purpose and destiny. It is only after Doug rejects his father's distorted perspectives that he is able to begin his journey towards emotional healing.
