Answer:
Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Explanation:
Old Net profit margin = Net income/ Revenue
= $10,600/$205,000
= 5.170731707%
Old ROE = Net profit margin*Asset turnover*Equity multiplier
= 0.0517*1.33*1.75
= 12.03487805%
New net income = $10,600 + $10,250
= $20,850
New net profit margin = $20,850/$205,000
= 10.17073171%
New ROE = 0.1017*1.33*1.75
= 23.67237805%
Change in ROE = New ROE – Old ROE
= 23.67237805% - 12.03487805%
= 11.6375%
Therefore, Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Supporters of the progressive system claim that higher salaries enable affluent people to pay higher taxes and that this is the fairest system because it lessens the tax burden of the poor. ... Taxes do not discourage high earners from earning more, and the low tax rate encourages the poor to strive to earn more.
Answer:
at 11%. (Present value of annuity) An=$30,876.74
at 16% (Present value of annuity) An=$26,061.55
Explanation:
Given R=6000, each year
t = 8 yrs
j(1) = 11%,
j(2)=16%
m= 1
find An=?
We have i=j/m and n=m x t
Formula An={R[1-(1+i)^-n]} / i
={6000x[1-(1+0.11)^-8]} : 0.11
=$30,876.74
An={R[1-(1+i)^-n]} / i
={6000x[1-(1+0.16)^-8]} : 0.16
=$26,061.55
Answer:
a. electing board members who can replace management.
Explanation: