13. Because it can't be divided by a whole number except 1 and itself. 14 can be Divided by 2. 21 and 33 can be divided by 3 making them composite or divisible by more than just 1 and itself :)
Answer:
5, -5
Step-by-step explanation:
well 5-5 is 0 so that's it
:))))
Answer:
c is the correct option
Step-by-step explanation:
please mark me as brainlist
So I’m going to solve this using algebra OK?
So what you do is take the first integer as X.
Then we know that x(the first number) + X+2(the second number) is 288 right?
So we solve that saying x+x+2=288.
So 2X+2=288
2X+2-2=288-2 right?
So 2X=286.
So x is 286/2 right?
So x is 143.
Now the first number is 143 right?
So the second number should be 143+2 so 145.
I know they are not even but these are the solutions.
I don’t think there are any consecutive even numbers that add up to 288
Answer:
52
Step-by-step explanation:
plug in 3 if we're going by 0,1,2,3
2+ (3-1)25
2+50
52
