Answer:
They are similar because their corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportional in length.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the statements,
∠G≅∠K
∠F≅∠J
∠H≅∠L
The sides of triangle FGH are proportional to those of triangle JKL
FG/JK =GH/KL=FH/JL =1/2
It’s C! that’s the answer, hope it helps
Answer:
whats the question
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Simplifying
(20m + 3) + -1(7m + -5) = 0
Reorder the terms:
(3 + 20m) + -1(7m + -5) = 0
Remove parenthesis around (3 + 20m)
3 + 20m + -1(7m + -5) = 0
Reorder the terms:
3 + 20m + -1(-5 + 7m) = 0
3 + 20m + (-5 * -1 + 7m * -1) = 0
3 + 20m + (5 + -7m) = 0
Reorder the terms:
3 + 5 + 20m + -7m = 0
Combine like terms: 3 + 5 = 8
8 + 20m + -7m = 0
Combine like terms: 20m + -7m = 13m
8 + 13m = 0
Solving
8 + 13m = 0
Solving for variable 'm'.
Move all terms containing m to the left, all other terms to the right.
Add '-8' to each side of the equation.
8 + -8 + 13m = 0 + -8
Combine like terms: 8 + -8 = 0
0 + 13m = 0 + -8
13m = 0 + -8
Combine like terms: 0 + -8 = -8
13m = -8
Divide each side by '13'.
m = -0.6153846154
Simplifying
m = -0.6153846154Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer: True</h3>
Explanation:
Technically you could isolate any variable you wanted, from either equation. However, convention is to pick the variable in which isolating it is easiest, and most efficient.
The key thing to look for is if there's a coefficient of 1. This is found in the second equation for the y term. Think of -4x+y = -13 as -4x+1y = -13. Due to the coefficient of 1, when solving for y we won't involve messy fractions.
If you were to solve for y, then you'd get y = 4x-13, which is then plugged in (aka substituted) into the first equation. That allows you to solve for x. Once you know x, you can determine y.