Answer:
The Inference that can be drawn is that King Creon are King Creon is incapable of making decisions.
King Creon does not want to be king.
King Creon values service to the country.
King Creon has no sense of morality.
Explanation:
Just took it
Answer:
ok also if this is for homework change it up a bit incase they have originallity report also this is like a dhar man script
Explanation:
Hi friend 1 hi friend 2 wanna go to the mall friend 1 ok friend 2 goes to the mall
robber 1 EVERYBODY GET ON THE GROUND friend 1 ok friend 2 ok
robber 1 HEY YOU WHATS YOUR NAME friend 1 friend 1
robber 1 WELL THATS SOME NICE JEWLERY GIVE ME IT friend 1 please no its was my grandmothers robber 1 WELL I DONT CARE friend 2 punches robber
robber 1 panicks and friend 2 and robber have huge fight friend 2 wins the fight but is badly injured robber 1 gets arrested friend 2 has serious injuries and will die if he does get treated but he doesnt have enough money. friend 1 is sad and post the story on go fund me. overnight go fund me page blows up. Friend one gives money for treatment to friend 2. Friend 2 lives and happy ever after.
I agree. While helping others with their problems, it really opens your eyes as to how good you really have it most of the time. As the saying goes, "you could always have it worse".
Answer:
Nadia Arumugam will completely agree with this cartoon because she clearly stated that 'no one is completely banned from taking unlimited amounts of soda since they are not restricted from ordering two or more bottles of soda if they so desire'.
Explanation:
In the cartoon the picture of a man drinking a giant-sized soda before the ban, was compared to him after the ban buying two cans of soda. There was clearly no difference between the two because the objective of the ban which was to reduce obesity was defeated. The man remained obese.
This is in line with Nadia's argument that the ban does not prevent anyone from drinking an unlimited amount of soda since they could simply buy two or more cans if they so desire.
