Answer:
$12,500
Explanation:
Differential revenue = Alternative A revenue - Alternative B revenue
Differential revenue = $75,000 - $62,500
Differential revenue = $12,500
Thus, the differential revenue for this decision is $12,500
Suppose an unlevered firm issues $1000 in debt at a cost of debt of 10%. If the corporate tax rate is 20%, $200 t is the change in the firm's value.
Due to the issue of the corporate tax rate is entitled to Interest Tax Shield assuming Debt issued by the firm is perpetual and ignoring financial distress costs
Change in Value of firm
=Net Effect of Debt Financing
=Present Value of Interest Tax Shield (financial distress costs ignored)
= DebtValue * Cost of Debt * Tax Rate Interest Rate
= $1,000 * 10% * 20% 10%
=$200,
corporate tax rate, also known as corporate income tax or corporate tax, is a direct tax levied on the income or capital of a corporation or similar corporation. Many countries impose such taxes at the national level, and similar taxes may be levied at the state or local level.
Learn more about tax rate here: brainly.com/question/25791968
#SPJ4
Answer:
The beta coefficient for Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium
Explanation:
According to Capital Asset Pricing Model, the formula to compute expected rate of return is equals to
Expected rate of return = Risk free rate of return + Beta × (Market risk - risk free rate of return)
where,
rRF = risk free rate of return
rM = market risk
Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium is expected rate of return which equals to = 9.25%
So,
9.25% = 3.6% + Beta × (8.5% - 3.6%)
9.25% = 3.6% + 4.9% Beta
9.25% - 3.6% = 4.9% Beta
5.65% = 4.9% Beta
Beta = 5.65% ÷ 4.9% = 1.15
Hence, the beta coefficient for Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium is 1.15
Answer:
B) service industry.
Explanation:
Service industry usually provide intangible products.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: smaller pipe
Explanation: for the first alternative that is constructing with bid size pipe which cost total of $115 million throughout the 50 years and a pumping cost which cost $25000 less than the smaller pipe for the next 16 years of which after those years, it will be equal.
While the smaller pipe cost $65million + $100million = $165million then plus the pumping cost which is equally higher than the big pipe cost . Already there is a difference in cost(minus pumping cost)= $165-115= $50million.
And then $25,000 *16 years= $400000 .
So the total difference in cost for the first 16 years is $50.4 million.
So now with interest rate of 8% you'll see that much capital is used in the smaller pipe , so if both pipe system receive interest rate of 8%, the smaller pipe will have more interest than the bigger.
