The paradox in hedging balance sheet exposure is that, by agreeing to receive or deliver foreign currency in the future under a forward contract, a transaction exposure is created.
A paradox is a logically self-contradictory announcement or a assertion that runs contrary to at least one's expectation.[1][2] it's far a declaration that, no matter apparently legitimate reasoning from genuine premises, results in a reputedly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable end.[3][4] A paradox usually entails contradictory-but-interrelated factors that exist simultaneously and persist through the years.[5][6][7] They result in "chronic contradiction among interdependent factors" leading to an enduring "cohesion of opposites".
Learn more about paradox here
brainly.com/question/17731343
#SPJ4
When managers delegate work, three transfers occur. the three transfers are responsibility, authority, and accountability
Answer:
6) Forecasts:
Explanation:
Considering the available options the output in the systems thinking example of a decision support system is FORECASTS
Given that the Direct Support System's output is any form of representation that is a proud t of DSS input. It is usually in form of graphical objects, forms, or tables. This output shows the information that is derived from input analysis. It is used to support the decision-making process.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "Forecasts"
Answer: A. consumer expectation of an increase in their future income.
Explanation:
The supply curve is simply a graph that shows the relationship that is between the price of a particular good and the amount of quantity that is supplied.
A leftward shift in the supply curve for a good simply means that less of that good is supplied. All tye options will cause less of the goods to be supplied except consumer expectation of an increase in their future income.
Answer:
D) An illusory promise
Explanation:
An illusory promise is not enforceable. Illusory promises are simply illusions that seem or appear to a contract, but are not.
In this case, there is no consideration at all, therefore none of the parties is bound by a contract. It would be different if the company promised to pay a bonus if its profits are xx%. How can someone determine what is considered high profits, and how can you be sure that management will agree?
It is basically like telling someone else that you will give them something if you are happy and willing to do it. How can someone determine if you are happy or not, and how can someone know if you are willing to do it or not?
