Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the 2 equations
4x + 5y = - 12 → (1)
- 2x + 3y = - 16 → (2)
Eliminate the x- term by multiplying (2) by 2 and adding the result to (1)
- 4x + 6y = - 32 → (3)
Add (1) and (3) term by term
11y = - 44 ( divide both sides by 11 )
y = - 4
I believe it’s 3.5 but I could totally be wrong I’m not much help at all
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
4.2*3 is 12.6 when you divide 12.6 by 0.7 you get 18.
Answer:
89/100
Step-by-step explanation:
The average weighted by the number of students is ...
(90(0.90) +10(0.80))/100 = (81 +8)/100 = 89/100