SOLUTION:
Case: Hypothesis testing
Step 1: Null and Alternative hypotheses
Step 2: T-test analysis
Step 3: t-test with the significance level
Step 4: Comparing
So tail to reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence at a 0.05 level of significance to claim that the mean spent is greater than P127.50.
Final answer:
Yes, there is evidence sufficient to conclude that the mean amount spent is greater than P127.50 per month at a 0.05 level of significance.
Step-by-step explanation:
(1 + cos θ + sin θ) / (1 + cos θ − sin θ)
Multiply by the reciprocal:
(1 + cos θ + sin θ) / (1 + cos θ − sin θ) × (1 + cos θ + sin θ) / (1 + cos θ + sin θ)
(1 + cos θ + sin θ)² / [ (1 + cos θ − sin θ) (1 + cos θ + sin θ) ]
(1 + cos θ + sin θ)² / [ (1 + cos θ)² − sin² θ) ]
Distribute and simplify:
(1 + cos θ + sin θ)² / (1 + 2 cos θ + cos² θ − sin² θ)
[ 1 + 2 (cos θ + sin θ) + (cos θ + sin θ)² ] / (1 + 2 cos θ + cos² θ − sin² θ)
(1 + 2 cos θ + 2 sin θ + cos² θ + 2 sin θ cos θ + sin² θ) / (1 + 2 cos θ + cos² θ − sin² θ)
Use Pythagorean identity:
(2 + 2 cos θ + 2 sin θ + 2 sin θ cos θ) / (sin² θ + cos² θ + 2 cos θ + cos² θ − sin² θ)
(2 + 2 cos θ + 2 sin θ + 2 sin θ cos θ) / (2 cos² θ + 2 cos θ)
(1 + cos θ + sin θ + sin θ cos θ) / (cos² θ + cos θ)
Factor:
(1 + cos θ + sin θ (1 + cos θ)) / (cos θ (1 + cos θ))
(1 + cos θ)(1 + sin θ) / (cos θ (1 + cos θ))
(1 + sin θ) / cos θ
The first one is 17 13/15 the second one is 22 1/20
Given that, the length of the garden is 2(x+6)feet and width is 3.5x feet.
So, length : l = 2(x+6) and width = 3.5x.
To find the fence of the garden we need to find the perimeter of the rectangle.
Formula to find the perimeter is:
p = 2l + 2b
= 2*2(x+6) + 2*3.5x
= 4(x+6) + 7x By multiplication.
= 4x + 24 + 7x By distribution property.
= 11x + 24 Combining the like terms.
So, he need to buy 11x + 24 feet fencing.
Hope this helps you!
Answer:
21
Step-by-step explanation:
To evaluate, substitute w = 6 into the expression, that is
15 + w = 15 + 6 = 21
