Answer: No, Paul has not breached a contract.
Explanation: To answer this, we must first we must define what a contract is.
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally binding, and which guides or governs the actions or conducts of the parties involved.
A quality that makes a contract legally binding is that it is enforceable by law.
In the scenario given in the question above, Paul has not breached any contract because there isn't one. The promise to buy dinner has not been legally bound, therefore, it is not enforceable by law, in essence, it is not qualified to be called a contract.
Answer:
a fired
b quit
Explanation:
involuntary is not by choice
voluntary is by choice
Answer:
No
Explanation:
the lo.ve of mone.y is a root of all kinds of e.v.il” or simply “for the love of money is the root of all e.vil.” Not m.oney itself, but the love of money. That's a key dis.tin.ction. Money itself is neither good nor e.vil.
hope it helps
:DD
Answer: <em>Option (d) is the correct answer.</em>
Ben view the investment by government as a way to jump start a weak economy, i.e. investment by government will allow industries to hire new employees or workforce in order to meet production demand. Thereby increasing government spending through investing in construction of road and bridge, Ben assumes that the state will intervene in market to help revive a weak economy.