All categories

2 years ago

The rectangle has a length of (x+3) and the width (x+1)

Mathematics

1 answer:

Tamiku [17]2 years ago

7 0

The answer is b
Because you have to add da x and dat is 2x den add da numbers which is 4

You might be interested in

Given: JP = KP; PX = PY Prove: APYJ - APXK Which best describes the missing reasons?

Alex73 [517]

Answer:

SAS Reflective property

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For what value of constant c is the function k(x) continuous at x = 0 if k =

nlexa [21]

The value of constant c for which the function k(x) is continuous is zero.

<h3>What is the limit of a function?</h3>

The limit of a function at a point k in its field is the value that the function approaches as its parameter approaches k.

To determine the value of constant c for which the function of k(x) is continuous, we take the limit of the parameter as follows:

$\mathbf{ \lim_{x \to 0^-} k(x) = \lim_{x \to 0^+} k(x) = 0 }$

$\mathbf{\implies \lim_{x \to 0 } \ \ \dfrac{sec \ x - 1}{x}= c }$

Provided that:

$\mathbf{\implies \lim_{x \to 0 } \ \ \dfrac{sec \ x - 1}{x}= \dfrac{0}{0} \ (form) }$

Using l'Hospital's rule:

$\mathbf{\implies \lim_{x \to 0} \ \ \dfrac{\dfrac{d}{dx}(sec \ x - 1)}{\dfrac{d}{dx}(x)}= \lim_{x \to 0} sec \ x \ tan \ x = 0}$

Therefore:

$\mathbf{\implies \lim_{x \to 0 } \ \ \dfrac{sec \ x - 1}{x}=0 }$

Hence; c = 0

Learn more about the limit of a function x here:

brainly.com/question/8131777

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

Teri went shopping with $300. Her Christmas shopping list is: 5 barbies for $10.50 each,, earbuds for $45, 3 sweaters for $22 ea

Romashka [77]

5 times 10.50 = $52.5

An additional $45

3 times 22 = $66

An other additional $65

The total price her shopping list costs is 229.5

Now, $300 - $229.5 = $70.5

Teri will have $70.50 left after buying these items.

3 0

2 years ago

BC Round your answer to the nearest hundredth. А 65° 6 B ?

belka [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Dale says the ratios 3:5 and 2:10 are equivalent. Is He correct? Explain

Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

No, Dale Isn't correct because 3:5 is greater than 2:10

Step-by-step explanation:

3:5 and 2:10 is the same as in $\frac{3}{5}$ and $\frac{2}{10}$

First Find the least common denominator or LCM of the two denominators:

LCM of 5 and 10 is 10

Next, find the equivalent fraction of both fractional numbers with denominator 10

For the 1st fraction, since 5 × 2 = 10,

$\frac{3}{5} =\frac{3*2}{5*2} =\frac{6}{10}$

Likewise, for the 2nd fraction, since 10 × 1 = 10,

$\frac{2}{10} =\frac{2*1}{10*1} =\frac{2}{10}$

Since the denominators are now the same, the fraction with the bigger numerator is the greater fraction

$\frac{6}{10} >\frac{2}{10} Or\frac{3}{5} >\frac{2}{10}$

Hence, $\frac{3}{5}$ is Greater than $\frac{2}{10}$

Hence, 3:5 is Greater than 2:10

3 0

2 years ago