Answer:
Option A-First mover advantage
Explanation:
The first mover advantage is the advantage to the firm who first steps in to take the risks to ensure future benefits in the long term perspective. The particular example includes of TaTa company in India which has more than 90% of the market and was the first company in India that tried to meet requirements of every class of person, small and medium organization to large corporations. This increased production helped the company to gain economies of scale and the country import policies also though do helped the company.
Furthermore, here the advertising firm is not investing but is a means of investment for many investors which means it has no investment in the country and hence there are no forward integration and lateral diversification.
It can also be noted that the company was not transferring its technology in the state option E is also incorrect.
The unrelated differentiation comes when the firm offer its customers a uniqueness of product services which in this case can not be seen prominent. The company advertises similar to other advertises like the other firms and is not pursuing unrelated differentiation so the option C is also incorrect.
Answer:
$208,530
Explanation:
The computation of value of levered firm is shown below:-
For computing the value of levered firm first we need to compute the Value of Unleavened firm
Value of unlevered firm = Earning before interest and tax × (1 - tax rate) ÷ Cost unlevered of Capital
= $39,000 × (1 - 33%) ÷ 15%
= $39,000 × 0.67 ÷ 15%
= $39,000 × 4.67
= $182,130
Now, the Value of levered firm = Value of unlevered firm + Outstanding debt × Tax rate
= $182,130 + $80,000 × 33%
= $182,130 + $26,400
= $208,530
Answer:
In simple words, Asset transformation can be understood as the process of turning small denominational, instantly available, and generally riskless deposit accounts into lenders moderately risky, high denomination assets that are returned according to a specified schedule–from obligations (deposits) with distinct traits.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.