Answer:
a) P value = 0.0013
b) No, it is not plausible that the silicon content of the water is no greater than it was 10 years ago
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis here is “Mean is equal to 5” while alternate hypothesis is that “Mean is greater than 5”
Given
Mean = 5, x’ = 5.4 and sigma = 1.2 and n = 85
Z = x-u’/sigma/sqrt n
Substituting the given values, we get –
Z = 3.02
A) P value = 0.0013 which is less than 0.05 and thus we will reject the null hypothesis
B) There is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
You'd solve this by creating the equation
20 + 6x - 1 + x + 14 = 180
33 + 7x = 180
- 33
7x = 147
÷ 7
x = 21
(because angles in a triangle add up to 180°)
And then you'd substitute in the value of x, so
6 × 21 = 126
126 - 1 = 125° = Angle A
21 + 14 = 35° = Angle C
I hope this helps!
Answer:
you save 1.70 and spend 15.30
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this equation you need to divide 975 by 72. After you divide those 2 numbers, you get 13/5... This means, that the scientist does not have enough distilled water for all 15 experiments. She only has enough for 13 experiments since about 1/2 is not a full amount.
Answer:
The answer is
A) Skewed left
Step-by-step explanation:
The line plot has about 3 point that are going more to the left than the others therefore it is skewed left.