<span>(2x + 1)(x + 3) = 2x^2 + 6x + x + 3 = 2x^2 + 7x + 3 A.</span>
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>Length of x is 98.2 m</h2><h2 /><h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2><h2 /><h2>Step 1:</h2><h2 /><h2>Use the trigonometric ratio tan 27° to find the common side of both the right angled triangles.</h2><h2 /><h2>tan 27° = opposite side/adjacent side =</h2><h2 /><h2>opposite side/9</h2><h2 /><h2>Opposite side = 9 tan 27° 9 x 3.27 =</h2><h2 /><h2>-29.46 m</h2><h2 /><h2>Step 2:</h2><h2 /><h2>Use this side and trigonometric ratio cosine to find the value of x.</h2><h2 /><h2>cos 49° = adjacent side/x = -29.46/x</h2><h2 /><h2>x = -29.46/cos 49° -29.46/0.30</h2><h2 /><h2>= 98.2 m (negative value neglected)</h2><h2 /><h2>
<em><u>Please</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>mark</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>me </u></em><em><u>Brainlist.</u></em></h2>
Answer:
1. D. 1
2. B. y=a³/x
3. A. y=1/x
Step-by-step explanation:
too long to give te explanations but they're there in the attachments
Answer:
c. Inductive and Strong
Step-by-step explanation:
In inductive reasoning, provided data is analyzed in order to reach a conclusion. In this case, the argument provides data regarding Jane and Nancy's awards and their love for mathematics and then draws a conclusion regarding Nancy's performance in a particular class, this is an example of inductive reasoning.
As for the strength of the argument, it is plausible to infer that Jane and Nancy have similar mathematics skills since they both love calculus and excel academically. Therefore, if Jane does well in the calculus class, it is a strong argument to say that Nancy does as well.
The answer is :
c. Inductive and Strong
Answer:
this isnt a math question
Step-by-step explanation:
;/
