Answer:
Extraneous Detail
Explanation:
Extraneous which is essenitially the same as not essential or relevant .
All the extraneous details in writing doesn't pass across any meaning or add to the purpose of the writing.
<span>I believe the correct answer is B. And I say it is as great to be a woman as to be a man. This line shows us that Whitman thinks of men and women the same - in his eyes, it is equally good to be either a woman or a man, he doesn't care about the gender of a person, what he cares about are their inner qualities. </span>
Answer:
The best description of the author's purpose in the article is:
To explain the process of researching ancestry through one person's story.
Explanation:
Learning about family history is the gateway to understanding the past. It also exposes our common humanity amidst diversity. Family genealogy generates lively memories that propel each generation to learn their unique family traditions, culture, and origin. This is why Matthew's gospel indispensably narrated the human genealogy of Jesus Christ. With ancestral history, one can connect with the past in order to rebuild today for the future.
Most likely A.
In this case a simple statement could be any of those, to shorten to the simple statement you would generalize :)
<span>D. He is appealing to the audience's sense of logic.
Appealing to the audience's sense of logic is called logos, and it is an important part of the Rhetorical Triangle. Audiences need logic, facts, statistics in order to trust the information that the speaker is presenting. The use of statistics here is appealing to that logic. </span>