Answer:
$290,450
Explanation:
The computation of the total shareholder equity for the year 2021 is shown below:
= Common stock issued + Net income - Dividends - Treasury stock purchased
= (10,100 shares × $6.90) + (20,800 shares × $9.30) + $109,000 - $41,000 - (3,600 shares × $11.30)
= $69,690 + $193,440 + $109,000 - $41,000 - $40,680
= $290,450
Hence, the total stockholder equity for the year 2021 is $290,450
Answer: Rise initially, but eventually fall.
Explanation:
The increase in the workers brought would increase the marginal product; there would be increase in production based on the number of persons that were engaged but the marginal cost might eventually fall in the future because of human management and resilience from the workers that were brought
Answer: 12.5%
Explanation:
Given the following :
Beta (B) = 1.3
Marginal tax rate = 34%
Risk free interest rate = 6%
Market rate of return = 11%
The cost of equity is calculated using the relation:
Risk free rate of return + Beta(market rate of return - risk free rate of return)
Cost of equity = 6% + 1.3(11% - 6%)
Cost of equity = 6% + 1.3(5%)
Cost of equity = 6% + 6.5%
Cost of equity = 12.5%
Therefore, the firm's cost of internal equity is 12.5%
Answer:
a. increase price in the short run but not in the long run.
Explanation:
The firms don't use resources that are available in limited quantities. So, as firm output increases, they can use resources in higher quantity but at the same price.
Therefore, as quantity demanded increases, the firms can supply higher quantity without any increase in resource cost. So, price increase in short run but not in the long term.
Answer:
Option B. It is unrealistic
Explanation:
The reason is that the people have different likes which means we will never see 100 percent acceptance from the customers which might in the way of rejecting the offer of Gary. So the assumption that 50,000 cab drivers will purchase its product is truly optimistic which in other words is unrealistic assumption. So the option B is correct.
Option A is incorrect because the assumption is less qualitative as it doesn't relies on realistic assumption.
The cab drivers sales are relevant here but the sales assumption was unrealistic (Highly optimistic assumption) so the option C and D are incorrect.
Option E is also incorrect because the sales to cab drivers can be measure by initially directly selling 1000 cell phone to 1000 cab drivers which will give an actual idea of sales units expected, which means it is measurable.
