Answer:
The best conclusion is that we are 90% that the true population proportion of Republicans that voted for Mitt Romney is between 0.7273 and 0.8106.
Step-by-step explanation:
x% confidence interval:
A confidence interval is built from a sample, has bounds a and b, and has a confidence level of x%. It means that we are x% confident that the population mean is between a and b.
In this question:
The 90% confidence interval for the proportion of Republican voters that had voted for Mitt Romney is (0.7273, 0.8106). The best conclusion is that we are 90% that the true population proportion of Republicans that voted for Mitt Romney is between 0.7273 and 0.8106.
The best measure of center tendency for this set of data would be the median. It is the best measurement because the data set has an outlier. The outlier is the 30. So to find the median we first order the data set and then find out if the set is an even or odd set. This set is even so we just chose the middle number. If the set was even, we would add the two center number and divide them by 2.
3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 30
The center tendency = 4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3a+10-4q+7a-4q-6 combine terms
10a-8q+4
8 or 8 1/2 because you won't finish the ride due to 28 + 3 1/2 being odd
Based on the two different purchases, you can write equations for the price of a hotdog (h) and that of a drink (d). These equations can be solved by your favorite method to find the individual prices.
... 6h +4d = 17.00 . . . . . . Carl's purchase
... 3h +4d = 12.50 . . . . . . Susan's purchase
We can see that the difference in purchase cost (of $4.50) is due entirely to the difference in the number of hotdogs (3). Thus, the price of a hotdog must be
... $4.50/3 = $1.50
The 4 drinks are then ($12.50 -4.50) = $8, so must be $2 each. You don't need to figure the cost of a drink to determine that the appropriate answer choice is ...
... D. $1.50 for a hot dog; $2.00 for a drink.