Ok, so I wrote these out just to make it a little bit easier for you to understand what I am about to explain.
So for the first one you have two different traits that can be inherited- having freckles or having no freckles, F and f respectively. The dominant trait (or having freckles) is shown by the capital F, and is almost always expressed over the recessive trait, or the lowercase f. So, for example, if you have a genotype of Ff, the trait having freckles will show up instead of not having freckles. The only way that you could have the trait of no freckles show up is if there are two recessive alleles for having no freckles, or ff. In this case, you have two parents who are both heterozygous for the trait of having freckles, so in other words the mother has Ff and the father has Ff. Each parent passes down one allele to the offspring, so since you are breeding Ff and Ff, you should result in having the possible genotypes of FF, Ff, Ff, and ff. This means that there is a 25% chance that the offspring will be homozygous for having freckles, a 50% chance that the offspring will be heterozygous for having freckles and a 25% chance that they would be homozygous for having no freckles, or a 1:2:1 ratio.
Incomplete dominance is a little bit different that just a normal monohybrid cross. Instead of just the dominant gene showing up in a heterozygous genotype, both traits show up. So like the question says, if a homozygous red flower plant was crossed with a homozygous white flower plant, their offspring would not just be white or red, they would be pink because it is a mixture of white and red. So then if you crossed the heterozygous, or Rr plants, the result would be a 25% chance of getting a homozygous RR red plant, a 50% chance of getting a pink Rr plant, and a 25% chance of getting a white rr plant, or another 1:2:1 ratio.
Sorry for the wordy answer, but hopefully this helps you understand this a little better :)
Yes all organisms display cellular respiration.
Answer:
White eyes are lethal in male Drosophila was the hypothesis of Thomas hunt which was valid. Hence the answer is option B.
Explanation:
Thomas hunt Morgan was a famous American biologist. He was more famous because of his experiment on drosophila which contributed most of things about the lifestyle and health science in much of the findings about those insects.
He was also awarded by the Nobel prize for his works which was related to medicine in 1933. He has also contributed many knowledge about the chromosome and heredity. he is finding is very helpful nowadays for the scientist and other biologist.
Answer:
A small change in our ecosystem could forever impact the whole web. For example, if bees were to go extinct, then flowers wouldn't be able to reproduce (since bees fertilize the flowers). Meaning the flowers would die out. And a lot of living things, including humans, depend on bees. Or let's say that a sharks were to go extinct. They play a major role in our ecosystem, because they eat fish and other sea creatures. The prey would then grow in population. Which would lead to a disaster. So in short terms, every creature in the ecosystem is vital to maintain the balance. I hope this helps!! :)