The magnitude of force on the elevator cable that would be needed to lower the cat/elevator pair is 198 Newton.
<u>Given the following data:</u>
- Acceleration = 2
To determine the magnitude of force on the elevator cable that would be needed to lower the cat/elevator pair, we would apply Newton's Second Law of Motion:
First of all, we would calculate the total mass of the cat/elevator pair.
Total mass = 99 kilograms
Mathematically, Newton's Second Law of Motion is given by this formula;
Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;
Net force = 198 Newton
Read more here: brainly.com/question/24029674
A car driving up a hill at a constant speed experiences no change in its kinetic energy while it's potential energy increases with increasing height, thus none of the options are correct.
Understanding the concept
Consider a car moving up the hill at a constant speed as shown in the figure below. The following forces act on the car:
- N is the normal reaction force acting in an upward direction
- f_s is the static friction force exerted due to friction between the road and the tires of the car
- f_k is the rolling friction force in the direction opposing that of the tire
- mg is the force acting in a downward direction.
- θ is the angle of inclination.
Here as the car is moving up the hill at a constant speed, the net force exerted on the car is zero. Also, the kinetic energy of the car will not change as its velocity is constant and the potential energy will change with increasing height. Thus, none of the given options are correct.
Learn more about motion on an incline here:
<u>brainly.com/question/13513083</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
1) 0.51 seconds.
2) 1.45 m/s.
Explanation:
given, height from which cat falls = 1.3 m
we know that, s = ut + 
at².
here if we consider cat moment only in downward direction,
intial velocity of cat in downward direction , u = 0.
so, time, t = 
.
⇒ t = 
= 0.51 seconds.
t = 0.51 seconds.
now, consider cat moment only in forward direction
s = ut , since acceleration is zero in forward direction
⇒ u = 
.
so, u = 
= 1.45 m/s .
Answer:
Rolling friction is much smaller than sliding friction because Rolling friction is considerably less than sliding friction as there is no work done against the body that is rolling by the force of friction. For a body to start rolling a small amount of friction is required at the point where it rests on the other surface, else it would slide instead of roll.
Rolling Friction example: Anything with weels (cars,skateboards) or a ball rooling.
Sliding Friction example: Bicycle brakes,skinning your knee walking,writing.
