Answer: The options are not given, here are the options.
A. One species is much better competitor than the other.
B. Periodic disturbances allow for coexistence.
C. Two species tended to use different resources.
D. The two species experienced interference competition and not exploitative competition.
The correct option C.
Two species tended to use different resources.
Explanation:
From Gause experiments on competing paramecium pairs, He found out that most times both species persisted and sometimes only one did because the two species uses different resources.
Organisms normally compete for limited resources in order to survive and one intend to compete well while other suffer. Both in the case of competing paramecium pairs, the pair use different resources which make the to persist and survive well. Once the resource of one finishes, the other one will persist because it is still surviving on its available resources.
In order to determine the results from a father who is homozygous recessive for the tongue rolling trait, T, and a mother who is heterozygous for the trait, a Punett square can be used to determine both the resulting genotype (allele combination) and phenotype (observable characteristics). The results are 50% Tt and 50% tt. Thus, the cross would result to 1:1 ratio of tongue rolling to non-tongue rolling offsprings.
Answer:
Kerb cycle
<u>Explanation</u>:
The result from mitochondria is ATP, that acts as a currency of the energy in the cell. In the cytoplasm of mitochondria kerb cycle occurs. In this process it has several other process, once it uses acetate and water to give NADH from NAD+ and gives carbon dioxide as waste. The NADH formed is fed by oxidative phosphorylation or electron transport. The outcome of these processes is oxidation of nutrients to give chemical energy in ATP form.
Explanation:
option D is the correct answer ..
hope this will be helpful to you .
plz mark my answer as brainlist if you find it useful
