Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
<span>group that has unrealistic expectations and therefore the group with the lowest self-esteem on the confidence scale administered by Leslie</span>
Answer: $20.44
Explanation:
From the question given, we are informed that Best Ever Toys just paid its annual dividend of $1.78 per share and that the required return is 10.6% and the dividend growth rate is 1.23%, then the expected value of this stock five years from now will be:
= [$1.78 × (1 + 1.23%)^6] / (10.6% - 1.23%)
= (1.78 × 1.0123^6)/(10.6% - 1.23%)
= 20.44
The expected value of the stock is $20.44
Answer:
If Chicago municipal bonds yield is 10% then Carter's treasurer make indifferent between the two.
Explanation:
Because Treasury Bond is exempt from tax income and both have same maturity, and they are equally risky and liquid; we then have the equation as below
Treasury bonds yield = Chicago municipal bonds yield after tax
⇔ 6% = Chicago municipal bonds yield * (1 - tax rate 40%)
⇔ 6% = Chicago municipal bonds yield * 0.6
⇒ Chicago municipal bonds yield = 6%/ 0.6 = 10%
Answer:
The answer is comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is when a country is able to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. That means a labour can produce more goods per hour than a labour in its trading partner's country.
A country with a comparative advantage will be able to charge lower price for what she is specialising on.
