Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
not sure how to explain it's kinda hard sorry
Answer:
<h3>For two events A and B show that P (A∩B) ≥ P (A)+P (B)−1.</h3>
By De morgan's law
which is Bonferroni’s inequality
<h3>Result 1: P (Ac) = 1 − P(A)</h3>
Proof
If S is universal set then
<h3>Result 2 : For any two events A and B, P (A∪B) = P (A)+P (B)−P (A∩B) and P(A) ≥ P(B)</h3>
Proof:
If S is a universal set then:
Which show A∪B can be expressed as union of two disjoint sets.
If A and (B∩Ac) are two disjoint sets then
B can be expressed as:
If B is intersection of two disjoint sets then
Then (1) becomes
<h3>Result 3: For any two events A and B, P(A) = P(A ∩ B) + P (A ∩ Bc)</h3>
Proof:
If A and B are two disjoint sets then
<h3>Result 4: If B ⊂ A, then A∩B = B. Therefore P (A)−P (B) = P (A ∩ Bc) </h3>
Proof:
If B is subset of A then all elements of B lie in A so A ∩ B =B
where A and A ∩ Bc are disjoint.
From axiom P(E)≥0
Therefore,
P(A)≥P(B)
Answer:
73 dollars and 50 cents
Step-by-step explanation:
Initial Deposit:
70
Years to Save:
1
Estimated Rate of Return
5
Compound Frequency:
Annually
Earned Interest
$3.50
Total Balance
$73.50
Hope this helps!
Answer:
No, these triangles cannot lie on the same line.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation: For two triangles to lie on the same line they must have the same slope. slopes are negative because the triangles are leaning to the left.