Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because the injunction is the legal remedy that the special court's judge orders not the jury. The order enforce a party to do what must be done or refrains it from doing specific acts that harms the other party. So saying that Doorway sought the court injunction in which the jury decides the right course of action is incorrect because injunction is the warning of judge not of jury.
Answer:
$101,293
Explanation:
$100,000 face amount + $7,000 interest to maturity ($100,000 x 7%) = maturity value less the discount for the time remaining to maturity of $5,707 ($107,000 x 8% x 8/12) = $101,293
Answer:
No
Explanation:
This is not unethical because it is a common and acceptable practice among many reputable public companies in the United States to adjust their account statements according to their objectives.
Remember, every organisation had a right to decide It's accounting methods.
In this scenario, what both parties hope to achieve is to build up confidence from potential investors.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
They are the ones to use to products.
