What are the answer choices?
Answer: Many countries and companies have rules against nepotism- favors from relatives. We all know it happens, but it would not be a good idea to leave a paper trail of evidence.
I would hope you have a good enough relationship with your uncle so he really could and would help you. If so, you should have a good enough relationship to talk to him on the phone.
Call him on the phone, ask him about the best way to get a job where he currently works—- don’t just tell him you need a job there. This way you are not putting him on the spot in an uncomfortable and possibly illegal situation or one that at least violates company policy. Let him come up with his own ideas on helping you. If he is well enough connected, he might in fact be able to get you a job behind the scenes. At minimum he can probably tell you the inside scoop on the best way to apply and have a decent chance of hire for that particular company, saving you lots of wasted time.
I would not write a letter telling him you “need” employment there. You are putting him in a very uncomfortable situation, where he is being pressured to make a choice: put his own reputation and position on the line professionally or choose not to help extended family and it is being done in writing. A more informal approach would be to request his help- he can then choose the best way to use his knowledge and influence to help a relative in a way that will reflect his true confidence in your abilities and worthiness. If I personally had a niece or nephew go the letter route, I would likely see it as an attempt at coercion coming from a sense of entitlement, almost blackmail, and likely that relative would not have any chance of getting my support
Explanation: good luck!
The answer is: Character against nature
This is because the nature of the wind pushed his ship off course using the sails
Susan B. Anthony states that the founding documents confer rights on all people, including women, and therefore women are entitled to vote and she also states that women who are born in the United States are automatically considered citizens and therefore have the right to vote. These are the two arguments that she uses.
Susan B. Anthony was always committed to the women's suffrage movement since she considered the disfranchisement of women an injustice. On her speech, "On Women's Right to Vote" (1873), Susan B. Anthony, a famous women's rights activist, refers to the Constitution (1787), the supreme law of the United States and a power that no state can deny that establishes that all United States citizens, including women and men, are entitled to vote, in order to support her argument that women also have the right to vote. Furthermore, Susan B. Anthony argues that, by being persons, women are also citizens and that the disfranchisement of women that have been born in the United States goes against what Webster, Worcester and Bouvier, famous lexicographers, define as 'citizen' and what has been established in the Constitution, a violation which makes the government antidemocratic.
Anthony had an important role in the women's suffrage movement in a time when white men that governed the country discriminated different minorities, including women and black men.
