Answer:
Homer notices that he gains more weight if he eats more doughnuts. Fill in the blanks to com the passage about the correlation between weight and doughnuts.
There is a __positive_____correlation between the number of doughnuts Homer eats and his weight. If Homer wants to lose weight, he should eat___less____ doughnuts. If Homer graphed this relationship on a scatter plot, an increase on the y axis would lead to__an increase______ on the x axis.
Explanation:
According to the question, Homer's doughnut consumption and weight should be graphed so that an increase in the x-axis would lead to an increase in the y-axis. The x-axis is the independent variable while the y-axis is always the dependent variable and not vice versa. The number of doughnuts that Homer consumes should be plotted on the x-axis and the weight obtained on the y-axis because the weight depends on the number of doughnuts consumed.
<span>student loans will offer a six month grace period after a student/ borrower leaves the school, interest on the loans will add to the cost of the loans on top of what you already owe</span>
Answer:
6.30%
Explanation:
For offering for the investor to prefer them to the corporate bond we need to calculate the after tax return which is shown below
After tax return is
= Before tax return × (1 - tax rate)
= 0.09 × (1 - 0.30)
= 0.063 or 6.30%
As the after tax return is 6.30% the same is to be offered for the investor
Hence, the correct answer is 6.30%
The term <u>price taker</u> refers to a firm operating in a perfectly competitive market that must take the prevailing market price for its product. Read below about a perfectly competitive market.
<h3>What is a perfectly competitive market?</h3>
In economics, a perfect market is also known as an atomistic market. A effect competition is defined by several idealizing conditions, collectively called perfect competition, or atomistic competition.
Therefore, in such a market the price taker must take the prevailing market price its product.
learn more about price taker: brainly.com/question/15416827
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. No. A state court will do a better job in this case because it exercises unlimited jurisdiction. Moreover, you can only bring your case to a federal court if the amount of your claim is up to $75,000 or the issue is exclusive to the federal court. This is not the case here.
b. Yes and No. We need some additional information about the accident location to help answer this question definitively.
c. No. You should not consider accepting the offered settlement. The jury award is meant to pay for your medical bills and also to help you recover financially as though the accident did not happen in the first place. Accepting any lesser amount after the judgment is rendered is in bad taste. The other party should have negotiated to settle out of court before the final judgment was rendered. But it did not. So, go with the jury award.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Missed work for 15 weeks
Total medical bills incurred = $50,000
Total lost wages incurred = $15,000
Jury award = $100,000 ($50,000 for medical, $15,000 for lost wages and $35,000 for punitive damages)
Settlement offer = $50,000
