Answer:
$10.49
Explanation:
The computation of the net asset value of the fund is shown below:
= (Market value of the assets - market value of the liabilities) ÷ number of oustanding shares
where,
Market value of assets is
= (200,000 × $35) + (300,000 × $40) + (400,000 × 20) + (600,000 × 25)
= $42,000,000
So, the net asset value of the fund is
= ($42,000,000 - $30,000) ÷ (4,000,000)
= $10.49
Answer:
The people who buy the stock
Explanation:
I'm not sure but that's my best guess considering they bought it and would more than likely have to sign a contract of liability.
Answer:
$85,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Shares sold = 50,000 shares of $3 par common stock for $5
Buys back = 10% of its common shares outstanding for $7 per share
Total equity on December 31 = $300,000
Balance in stockholder's equity without retained earnings:
= Beginning balance in stockholder's equity + Increase in stockholder's equity - Decrease in stockholder's equity
= $0 + (50,000 × $5) - (50,000 × 10% × $7)
= $250,000 - $35,000
= $215,000
Retained earnings on December 31:
= Total equity at December 31 - Balance in stockholder's equity without retained earnings
= $300,000 - $215,000
= $85,000
Answer:
No, the cost of the annual premium for 10 years was less than the accident claims
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the annual premium is $1,200, $200,000 is the bodily injury coverage and $100,000 should be the property damage coverage
Also the $40,000 and $20,000 represent the medical cost and the car damage
So here the cost should not outweight the benefit of the transferring the risk as the annual premium cost for ten years should be lower than the accident claims