Answer:
d. $150,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the consolidated goodwill reported is shown below:
= Recorded amount of goodwill - impairment amount of goodwill
= $200,000 - $50,000
= $150,000
By deducting the impairment of goodwill from the recorded amount of goodwill we can get the consolidated goodwill that is to be reported.
The 90% acquired percentage is ignored
Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:
I think D. If I'm wrong I'm sorry
Answer:
The correct answer is: <u>5 years</u>.
Explanation:
To begin with, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 is the name given to an American law in the U.S. federal government in order to protect the rights of the civilians who were called to serve in military services regarding the subjects of their jobs and employment. It was signed into law by the U.S. President Bill Clinton in October 13, 1994.
Secondly, the criteria from the act known as USERRA establishes that the maximun period of time that a person could be absent from his work due to military duties and still retain reemployment according to the act is up to five years.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
There are several Supreme Court Rulings regarding the ADEA during the past two decades, most of them concerning technical issues, but the most straightforward ruling regarding the question is:
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 (2004)
The Supreme Court ruled that the purpose of the ADEA is to prevent discrimination against older workers in benefit of younger workers, but it does not prevent discrimination against younger workers in benefit of older workers.