Managerial economics can be applied to the non-profit organizations too because it help them in organizing, and controlling their resources.
Managerial economics is relevant to nonprofit organizations and government agencies as well as conventional, for-profit businesses.
<h3>What is
Managerial economics?</h3>
Managerial economics is an area of economics that is used for staffing, as well as controlling the resources of the organization.
With Managerial economics , one can carry out:
- planning
- directing
- organizing
In this case, Managerial economics is relevant to nonprofit organizations and government agencies as well as conventional, for-profit businesses.
Learn more about Managerial economics at:
brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ1
To ensure that her company is being socially responsible, Vivian should ensure that the cars are environmentally friendly. Being socially responsible means you do what is best for planet, people, and profits. In this case, taking care of the planet means choosing the car that is the most environmentally friendly.
Answer:
some goods aren't internationally traded
Explanation:
Purchasing power parity is most popularly known as the PPP. It may be defined as the measure of the prices of the various countries which makes use of the price of some specific goods in order to compare the absolute purchasing capability or power for the countries' currencies.
It is used to measure and compare prices at different locations.
The purchasing power does not hold good in the short to the medium run as different countries produces different goods and as such all the goods are not internally traded all over the locations or countries.
Answer:
Efficiency wage theory
Explanation:
Efficiency wage theory was first postulated by Alfred Marshall, where he viewed compensation to workers as based on their efficiency.
Companies use efficient wage to reduce staff turnover, as staff are motivated to stay because of wages that are above the industry standard.
It is also a way to reduce cost mostly in industries where the cost of staff replacement is high.
Answer:
In this scenario, <u>LISA</u> has both an absolute advantage in food preparation, and <u>LISA</u> has a comparative advantage in food preparation.
Assume that initially, Sam and Lisa are splitting both tasks for a large number of events. Then they decide to start shifting some work according to the principle of comparative advantage. In particular, the person with the comparative advantage in food preparation will take over preparing food for one more event, and the other person will use the freed-up time to get more clients. As a result, the total number of events for which food is prepared will remain unchanged, but the number of new clients will increase by <u>1</u>.
Before they were getting 3 new customers since Sam got 2 and Lisa 1, but since Sam will only look for clients, then the total number of clients will be 4 (or 1 more).
Explanation:
It takes Sam 12 hours to prepare the food for an event and 3 hours of effort to get each new client.
- Sam's opportunity cost of preparing food = 12/3 = 4 new clients
- Sam's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 3/12 = 0.25 of food preparation
For Lisa, it takes 10 hours to prepare food for an event and 5 hours to get a new client.
- Lisa's opportunity cost of preparing food = 10/5 = 2 new clients
- Lisa's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 5/10 = 0.5 of food preparation
