Answer:
When you have to do an English-Metric (SI) length conversion, and you already know the English units of length (miles, yards, feet, inches, etc.), all you need to remember is one simple relationship, and you can readily convert any length in the SI system, to the equivalent length in the other.
1 foot (ft) = 0.3048 meters (m)
BIn this case you need your answer in inches. You (hopefully) know there are 12 inches in a foot, so you just do the following:
1 inch (in) = 1/12 ft = 0.3048/12 m = 0.0254 m
Answer:
The focal length is 16.86 cm and the distance of the man if he wants to form an upright image of his chin that is twice the chin's actual size is 8.43 cm.
Explanation:
Given that,
Object distance u=1.54 m =154 cm
Image distance v = 15.2 cm
Magnification = 2
We need to calculate the focal length
Using formula of mirror
Put the value into the formula
We need to calculate the focal length
Using formula of magnification
Put the value into the formula
Using formula of for focal length
Hence, The focal length is 16.86 cm and the distance of the man if he wants to form an upright image of his chin that is twice the chin's actual size is 8.43 cm.
<span>A: put an atom on a poster in the exhibit
Good luck. The poster itself is made of trillions of trillions of trillions
of atoms. You could not see the extra one any easier than you could
see the ones that are already there, and even if you could, it would be
lost in the crowd.
B: use a life size drawing of an atom
Good luck. Nobody has ever seen an atom. Atoms are too small
to see. That's a big part of the reason that nobody knew they exist
until less than 200 years ago.
D: set up a microscope so that visitors can view atoms
Good luck. Atoms are way too small to see with a microscope.
</span><span><span>C: Display a large three dimensional model of an atom.
</span> </span>Finally ! A suggestion that makes sense.
If something is too big or too small to see, show a model of it
that's just the right size to see.
Observational studies are a prime example. Observational data is more reflective of the real environments that scientists make their inferences to than controlled experiments. The disadvantage of observational studies is that the variability is far greater. <span />
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss
