Answer:
1. Part that includes subject and main action
- Dr. Nima Mesgarani and his team are developing
2. Part that is a detail about the subject
- Professor of electrical engineering
3. Part that is the outcome of the main action
- technology that may someday translate people's thought into electronically produced speech.
Explanation:
I have been able to match each sentence to the part the question answers.
In no. 1 you discover that it mentions the name of the subject and his team and also informed us the action they are carrying out: "developing".
In no. 2, we see that the information/detail of the subject was clearly stated, that he is "Professor of electrical engineering".
In no. 3, we are giving the outcome of the main action. The outcome is that the technology that is being developed may someday translate people's thought into electronically produced speech.
Answer:
It contains an analogy and technical language but no allusion
Explanation:
The statements described this are
- Then he rode the bike for a minute, analyzing the change in the bike's performance
- he stared for ten minutes before tightening the rear sprockets.
Answer:
Explanation:
Well, commandments are rules or laws that must be followed or be broken in a satire/bad humor style, depends on the situation.
Answer:
The archaeologist had to<u><em> LAY</em></u> the delicate fragments of carefully onto the display table so that they could be photographed and cataloged.
Explanation:
