No. Science cannot go too far. Science is the method of pursuing knowledge, and the pursuit of knowledge. Knowledge in itself is not dangerous. It only becomes dangerous when people use it for immoral purposes, and THAT has nothing to do with the science that produced the knowledge.
Answer: B. They were Japanese American
Explanation:
Just took the quiz
In the revising stage you should edit and reread the memo to make sure that thats what you wanna say
Answer:
Name as a cause of
Explanation:
To answer this question you will need to try the prompts you are given out in the passage.
1. Some scientists name the starfish as a cause of invasion to pesticides
does that work? Yes it seems to fit in but we need to check the other options
2. Some scientists refuse to belive in the starfishes' invasion to pesticides
no that does not seem right because the starfish has thorns and certain characteristics that make it right to believe that they are the problem
3. some scientists draw attention to the starfishes' invasion to pesticides
yes it does seem right but we are already spotlighting the focus on starfish so it would be incorrect to reverberate the same statement
4. some scientists notice a change in the starfishes' invasion in pesticides
since we are looking at past tensed information scientists wouldnt be able to concuct something new about the starfish since the starfishes invasion was a cause of pesticides and fertilizers to reach water to generate more starfish
so we go with number 1 because it sounds and is proven reasonable
name as a cause of
Answer:
My dear friends!
Sports are the heat of our school and saying on a bigger level sports also make up the heart of our country. Although, many sport activities are encouraged in our country, yet there are still not practiced by many people. An example of such a sport is the amazing water polo! It is a competitive sport which is played in water. It will not only help us all to play together and also playing it in water will be more fun.
