Answer:The first kind depends on the personal character of the speaker [ethos]; the second on putting the audience into a certain frame of mind [pathos]; the third on the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of the speech itself [logos]. hope this helps
whats your teachers name and address she needs to stop like now.
Explanation:
The internet, is the modern medium easily allowing false information and hoaxes to be spread.
Tybalt is the son of Lady Capulet’s brother and Juliet’s hot-headed first cousin.
I do not think that Phil can predict the weather. First, he is only a groundhog. He does not have weather equipment or any tools that would give him knowledge of weather patterns. Second, Phil would not see his shadow on a cloudy day. Winter is usually the cloudiest and darkest of all seasons. If Phil does not see his shadow, it should indicate that spring is not coming early. Third, the groundhog that is called Phil is not the original groundhog used on the first Groundhog Day. The entire celebration is just a way for people to get excited about the coming of spring, it's not an actual forecasting tool.
I think that Phil can predict the weather. First, he is a groundhog. He is more aware of nature and the changes in the weather than people are. Second, he and the groundhogs that have come before him have always been used to predict whether or not spring will come. If he was not a reliable indicator, people would have stopped asking Phil to predict the weather many years ago. Last, when Phil does not see his shadow, that means the weather is cloudy. The clouds show that there is rain coming and spring is the rainy season.
Answer:
A. The burden of things
F. The value of things
J. The call for things
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
<em>Type A,B, or C for blank 1</em>
The burden of things
The loss of things
The beauty of things
<em>Type E, F, or G for Blank 2.</em>
The demand of things
The value of things
The absence of things
<em>Type H, I, or J for Blank 3.</em>
The need for things
The passion for things
The call for things
This question refers to the essay "The Tyranny of Things" by Elizabeth Morris. In this essay, Morris argues that possessing and desiring things can be a burden on people. She refers to this burden as a "tyranny," due to the fact that such a need can end up controlling and affecting your whole life. Morris also talks about the value of things, as she urges us to only acquire those things that truly bring value to us. Finally, she discusses the call for things, as well as the urge that people often have to own more than they need, even if this causes them more problems than benefits.
