Answer: by having the speaker explore the mysterious noise
Explanation:
The speaker hears a noise and decides to check it out. That brings a suspense. But if the speaker just stayed there and did nothing there wouldn’t be any suspense at all
Answer:
effley is mischievous, lazy, paranoid, arrogant, and dishonest. He is known to become jealous easily. He also tends to be a poor friend, something even he agrees with. ... This is because Greg has a tendency for getting himself and Rowley into trouble.
Explanation:
It can be deduced that the central idea is that A. "That I wasn't worthy." ( paragraph 8).
<h3>What is a central idea?</h3>
It should be noted that the central idea is the main idea that's in a literary work. It's what the author wants others to know
The statement that states the central message in the story is "That I wasn't worthy". The narrator stated that she wasn't invited and had to stay under a tree.
Learn more about central idea on:
brainly.com/question/2684713
Answer:
OD. Heartbreak.
Explanation:
Miss Havisham is one of the major characters in Charles Dickens' novel "Great Expectations". She plasy a pivotal role in the progression of the plot and also acts as a means through which Pip learns about life.
In Chapter XXII, Herbert Pocket told Pip that Estella "<em>has been brought up by Miss Havisham to wreak revenge on all the male sex</em>." This is due to the fact that her guardian Miss Havisham had been jilted by Compeyson on what was supposed to be their wedding day. Holding a grudge on all men, she hates and have a sense of repulsion for every male human. This, according to Herbert, is the main cause for her eccentric behavior.
Antecedent is an expression that gives meaning to the word coming after that. For example, I was late to the meeting because police held me for speeding. In this sentence, pronoun me is an explained word which explain another pronoun - I. Antecedent has been used correctly in this sentence. In this question, the first option is correct. Antecedent has been used incorrectly in the second sentence because it's unclear who is considered with the pronoun he. The third option is also an incorrect antecedent because the explaining word has not been given.