Which writing assignment are you going with? the first one wants to know what you think is important to successfully experiencing the college and how you’ll have a successful experience yourself using the techniques. the second wants to know what you learned and how you’ll apply the new information you learned.
Answer:
B. Tonya has a bandage, so the reader knows that she has hurt her finger.
Explanation:
We are asked to select an answer that tells us why the sentence overexplains the meaning.
The sentence is: <em>Tonya had a bandage on her finger because she had hurt it in some way.</em>
<em />
This sentence overexplains by stating the fact that Tonya had hurt her finger. If the sentence had simply stated:
<em>Tonya had a bandage on her finger.</em>
<em />
The reader could infer that she had hurt her finger, instead of the sentence having to explain that fact.
I hope you have a wonderful day! If you found this answer helpful, Brainliest is appreciated.
A. Sharecroppers worked the fields
B. Many formerly enslaved children could not read
C. There was tension between white landowners and formerly enslaved people
E. People had complicated identities and family relationships
Explanation:
Answer:
C. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the number of hours of sunlight changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled.
Explanation:
A controlled experiment is an experiment used to test a single variable at a time. The variable that is being tested is called the independent variable, and it is directly manipulated by a scientist. The rest of the variables need to remain unchanged in order not to get wrong results like the scientist in the given scenario.
As the scientist is trying to see how gamma rays affect marigolds, only the gamma ray exposure is supposed to change throughout the experiment. The amount of water remained the same, but the number of hours of sunlight didn't. That's why we don't know what exactly affected the growth of marigolds - the sunlight or the gamma rays? And that's why the scientist's conclusion is flawed.
